Perpex vs Hyperdash: Hyperliquid copy trading compared

Perpex and Hyperdash both let you trade on Hyperliquid and copy other traders. The table compares what each product states in its own documentation; every row links to its source.

Facts checked on 2026-10-01. Products and fees change; verify on each site before deciding.

This comparison is for information only and is not investment advice. Trading perpetual futures carries a risk of loss, and copied results can differ from the source trader.

What each product states on its own pages
TopicPerpexHyperdash
Funds and custody

Non-custodial interface developed by Celebit Ltd. Collateral stays in your own Hyperliquid account.

Source

Google, Apple or email sign-in creates a non-custodial wallet secured by Turnkey; existing Hyperliquid accounts can connect through an API key.

Source
Account setup

Connect a wallet, authorize a Hyperliquid agent key (it can place orders but cannot withdraw) and approve the builder fee.

Source

Copying from a connected wallet needs at least $100 USDC, an API key valid for 180 days, approval of the 0.05% builder fee and unified account mode.

Source
Trading fees

Perpex’s only fee is a 0.10% builder fee on eligible order fills, separate from Hyperliquid trading fees and funding.

Source

Builder fee of 0.015% on perps and 0.03% on spot and prediction markets, on top of Hyperliquid fees.

Source
Copy trading cost

Copied orders use the same 0.10% builder fee on eligible fills. No performance fee.

Source

0.05% builder fee plus standard exchange fees; copy trading volume is not eligible for fee rebates.

Source
Copy trading

Available, after checks on the owner wallet, agent authorization, builder approval, collateral and market and account mode.

Source

Copytrade (mirror) or Countertrade (opposite side) up to 10 traders from a wallet dedicated to the strategy.

Source
Copy risk controls

Choose allocation and risk limits before starting; stop an active relationship in the app.

Source

Leverage cap from 1x to 40x, optional new-positions-only mode, a limit on how much worse your entry price may be than the trader’s, and asset whitelists or blacklists.

Source

How Perpex differs

  • Perpex charges one fee, a 0.10% builder fee, on eligible fills of both your own and copied orders, with no performance fee. Hyperdash lists different builder fees for regular trading and for copy trading.

About Perpex

Apps
Web app, plus apps on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android). Source
Trader analytics
Public trader profiles built from a Perpex data set of processed Hyperliquid fills starting in March 2025. Source

Where Hyperdash may fit better

Hyperdash documents countertrading (taking the opposite side of a trader), copying up to 10 traders from one wallet, more granular copy controls and sign-in with Google, Apple or email. The copy fees differ, so compare them in the table. On Perpex, grid and algorithmic bots are coming soon.

How we compared

Each competitor fact comes from that company's own website or documentation and links to the exact page. Facts we could not confirm there are left out rather than guessed.

Dexly, Hyperdash, Copin, Arco and BitMEX are products of their respective owners. Perpex is developed by Celebit Ltd and is not affiliated with them.

Frequently asked questions

Do Perpex or Hyperdash hold my funds?

Perpex does not; collateral stays in your own Hyperliquid account. Hyperdash's documentation describes non-custodial wallets secured by Turnkey and connected wallets that stay in your custody.

What does copy trading cost on each?

On Perpex, eligible copied fills carry the 0.10% builder fee and there is no performance fee. Hyperdash’s documentation lists a 0.05% builder fee for copy trading. Hyperliquid trading fees apply on both.