0x0a06…2a7b Hyperliquid wallet
- Account value
- $554,687
- Open positions
- Notional
Performance
Cumulative PnL
Hyperliquid PnL history, excludes deposits and withdrawals
Drawdown
Distance below the previous high of the time-weighted return
Worst drawdown in 30 days: 14.3%. Last new high on Oct 27. 7-day worst: 2.9%.
Risk
Risk analysis
Five factors scored 0–10 from drawdown and the open positions; the score is their average
What could go wrong when copying
Based on this wallet's data. Copies fill after the trader does.
- Large money movements. About $126,197.35 was withdrawn in 30 days. Size changes like this can change how the trader takes risk.
- Timing and size differ. Copies are placed after the trader's orders, scaled to your allocation, and can miss fills or pay more slippage.
Statistics
Same metrics across three windows
| Metric | 7D | 30D | All time |
|---|---|---|---|
| PnL | +$29.96K | +$211.89K | +$3.60M |
| ROI | +4.6% | +45.2% | — |
| Time-weighted return | +4.5% | +45.0% | — |
| Max drawdown | 2.9% | 14.3% | — |
| Volume | $44.32M | $225.19M | $15.99B |
| Fills | — | — | — |
| Closed trades | — | — | — |
| Win rate | — | — | — |
| Realized PnL (closed) | — | — | — |
| Profit factor | — | — | — |
| Avg win | — | — | — |
| Avg loss | — | — | — |
| Avg hold | — | — | — |
| Fees paid | — | — | — |
| Profitable days | — | — | — |
PnL, ROI, volume and drawdown come from Hyperliquid portfolio history; trade counts, win rate and averages from Perpex closed-trade data. “—” means the value is not available for that window.
Positions and trade history
No active positions
Performance methodology
Daily records may have gaps. Portfolio PnL includes unrealized changes; asset mix and direction use recorded closed trades. Their coverage can differ. Drawdown uses the last 30 days of time-weighted returns, not lifetime history.
Wallet labels may be based on third-party public reporting. Perpex has not independently verified wallet ownership; an address label is not proof of identity or endorsement.
Read the performance methodology