0x89e2…59c2 Hyperliquid wallet
- Account value
- $24.38
- Open positions
- Notional
- 10 markets traded
Performance
Cumulative PnL
Hyperliquid PnL history, excludes deposits and withdrawals
Daily PnL
Realized PnL per UTC day from closed trades
18 of 45 days were profitable. Best day +$61.27K, worst day −$124.80K.
Show data table
| Date | PnL | Fills |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | +$4.83 | 23 |
| Oct 26, 2026 | −$49.42 | 61 |
| Jun 13, 2026 | $0.00 | 1 |
| Jun 11, 2026 | −$9.80K | 1,581 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | +$6.53K | 8,022 |
| Jun 9, 2026 | +$25.66K | 11,151 |
| Jun 8, 2026 | −$22.11K | 8,685 |
| Jun 7, 2026 | −$35.69K | 8,345 |
| Jun 6, 2026 | +$2.81K | 7,155 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | +$11.01K | 19,416 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | −$124.80K | 25,250 |
| Jun 3, 2026 | −$70.32K | 13,890 |
| Jun 2, 2026 | +$61.27K | 8,562 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | −$42.77K | 11,376 |
PnL calendar
Each square is one UTC day; deeper colour means a larger result
Risk
What could go wrong when copying
Based on this wallet's data. Copies fill after the trader does.
- Timing and size differ. Copies are placed after the trader's orders, scaled to your allocation, and can miss fills or pay more slippage.
Markets
PnL by market
Realized PnL of closed trades, top markets by volume
Show data table
| Market | PnL | Volume | Win rate | Trades |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | −$383.80K | $2.63B | 27.8% | 871 |
| HYPE | +$32.01K | $284.58M | 28.1% | 221 |
| NEAR | −$140.46K | $82.54M | 27.5% | 91 |
| XRP | −$34.99K | $71.4M | 27.4% | 62 |
| ETH | +$393.10 | $26.88M | 26.7% | 30 |
| TON | −$28.52K | $16.45M | 13.0% | 23 |
| ZEC | −$1.15K | $9.53M | 18.2% | 22 |
| CRV | −$13.13K | $8.65M | 30.6% | 36 |
Volume by market
Traded volume of closed trades
BTC and HYPE make up 93% of the volume.
Long vs short
Closed trades split by direction
Behaviour
Rarely closes positions fully
Histograms need at least 10 fully closed positions in 30 days
In 30 days this wallet closed 3 positions to zero across 84 fills. It mostly adds to and trims positions that stay open, so closed-position histograms would say little about how it trades.
Statistics
Same metrics across three windows
| Metric | 7D | 30D | All time |
|---|---|---|---|
| PnL | −$113.36 | −$113.01 | −$1.01M |
| ROI | — | — | — |
| Time-weighted return | — | — | — |
| Max drawdown | — | — | — |
| Volume | $166,619.71 | $166,619.71 | $3.16B |
| Fills | 84 | 84 | — |
| Closed trades | 3 | 3 | 1,458 |
| Win rate | — | — | 27.6% |
| Realized PnL (closed) | −$44.59 | −$44.59 | −$655.37K |
| Profit factor | — | — | 0.76 |
| Avg win | — | — | +$5.18K |
| Avg loss | — | — | −$2.59K |
| Median hold | — | — | 20m |
| Fees paid | $74.98 | $74.98 | $834,819 |
| Profitable days | 1 / 2 | 1 / 2 | 18 / 45 |
| Partial closes | 4 | 4 | 3,837 |
| Win rate (partial closes) | — | — | 30.8% |
| Profit factor (partial closes) | — | — | 0.79 |
| Realized PnL, perps (all fills) | −$44.59 | −$44.59 | −$655.37K |
PnL, ROI, volume and drawdown come from Hyperliquid portfolio history; trade counts, win rate and averages from Perpex closed-trade data. “—” means the value is not available for that window. A partial close is an order that reduced an open perp position, including the order that closed it; its PnL is the realized PnL of those fills, before fees.
Positions and trade history
No active positions
0x89e2…59c2 · Hyperliquid wallet analysis
Over 30 days, this Hyperliquid wallet recorded -$113.01 in portfolio PnL, with a -76.8% return.
The largest recorded trading volumes are in BTC · HYPE · NEAR. Closed trades: 53.2% long / 46.8% short.
Performance methodologyData retrieved: 29 Oct 2026, 05:15:18 UTC
Daily records observed: 01 May 2026 – 27 Oct 2026.
Daily records may have gaps. Portfolio PnL includes unrealized changes; asset mix and direction use recorded closed trades. Their coverage can differ. Drawdown uses the last 30 days of time-weighted returns, not lifetime history.
Wallet labels may be based on third-party public reporting. Perpex has not independently verified wallet ownership; an address label is not proof of identity or endorsement.
Read the performance methodology